Firm News
Firm News
Contractual disagreements, including contract breaches and differing views regarding a contract’s interpretation, can quickly lead to legal proceedings. Litigation, in turn, has the potential to result in damaged partnerships, delayed business operations, and significant financial consequences. By adopting prudent, carefully considered strategies such as calm, objective decision-making and sound contract drafting, companies can effectively anticipate and manage contentions before they can substantially harm their firms. For additional information on the different practices for preventing contract disputes, schedule a consultation with a seasoned New York business litigation attorney from Schwab & Gasparini by calling their Syracuse office at (315) 422-1333, Albany site at (518) 591-4664, or Hudson Valley or White Plains locations at (914) 304-4353.
In the context of contract law, a “dispute” typically refers to an argument between contractual participants. Such disagreements may concern the agreement’s implementation, performance, or terms. Worth noting is that although many clashes can involve deal breaches, not all do; for example, if only a single party wishes to adjust an agreement or if there is a lack of consensus regarding how to interpret a particular clause, this might culminate in contractual rows.
The parties to a contract may choose to settle their grievances in many ways, including via discourse or through more formal mechanisms, such as litigation or alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Per the American Bar Association (ABA), ADR entails resolving a disagreement through procedures like arbitration, conciliation, settlement, or mediation without the case going to court. Sometimes, the means to be used for dispute resolution are specified in the contract itself.
Several ways of averting a disagreement concerning a business deal exist, such as drafting contract documents with attention to the precise use of language and watching out for the warning signs of a communication breakdown, such as a change in the tone of interactions related to the interpretation or fulfillment of contract clauses. Below are some additional examples covered in more detail.
One ideal way to protect all the parties associated with a contract is to craft the essential document carefully in the first place. If consensus never relies on partially documented or orally agreed terms, it is easier to prevent problems if relations between the participants break down since the presence of a comprehensive, minutely articulated, signed document makes it much more difficult for one party to bring into dispute what was originally agreed.
Effectively drafted business agreements usually mention the following items:
Contractual disagreements frequently arise and escalate due to rash decision-making and the failure of a participant to carefully consider their liabilities, obligations, and possible consequences before taking action. Notable examples include terminating an agreement without justification or accusing the other party of a breach when no violation of contract terms has taken place. Either action could have vast financial repercussions, such as damages for failing to fulfill a contract.
The most popular disagreement resolution technique is negotiation. Simple but often effective, negotiation entails alternating exchanges between each party in the conflict to reach a solution that pleases everyone. Negotiation––with or without the assistance of lawyers––is normally the initial dispute resolution practice adopted,
As a tool for remediating contractual disagreements, negotiation has these noteworthy characteristics:
Find out how a New York business litigation lawyer can help firms with their legal issues and explore how to avoid contract disputes in greater detail by arranging a consultation with Schwab & Gasparini.
If negotiation fails, the parties to a contract might resort to one of the following three additional procedures: mediation, litigation, and arbitration. Each of these options involves the use of third parties to help the contract participants overcome their impasse.
In mediation, an impartial third party, called a mediator, assists the contractual parties in seeking a mutually beneficial solution. A mediator’s primary duties are as follows:
Here are the benefits and drawbacks of utilizing mediation to solve business deal disagreements.
Mediation is a commonly employed contractual disagreement resolution procedure. This path to dispute resolution enjoys a high reputation in many industries, partly due to the process’s efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and confidentiality. As an added benefit, mediation allows for resolving business agreement conflicts without involving the courts, which can result in substantial savings of both time and money.
That said, mediation also presents its own challenges:
Whether mediation is an appropriate conflict resolution technique in a particular contract dispute will depend upon the circumstances of the contract and the disagreement between the parties.
Participants involved in a disagreement over the interpretation of a contract’s terms or the criteria for their fulfillment can utilize arbitration. This technique entails submitting the case to an arbitrator. Similar in some respects to a mediator, the arbitrator is a nonpartisan third party. Unlike a mediator, however, the arbitrator will typically hear each side of the case, analyze the evidence, and make their own enforceable, binding decision.
Litigation refers to the formal procedure of resolving a disagreement via the courts. Concerning contractual disputes, one party may opt to sue the other to acquire damages or compel the other litigant to fulfill the deal’s terms. While the ability to win definitive payment in damages can make this option appealing to contract participants who feel sure of their case or in instances where mediation has already been tried and failed, in general, litigation tends to be the least preferred of the three avenues to resolution due to its high stakes and often demanding time investment.
The advantages of utilizing litigation are as follows:
However, litigation has disadvantages too. Litigation downsides include the high costs involved, the fact that it is a public procedure, its time-consuming nature, and the extremely limited control that litigants have over what happens during legal proceedings.
Following the tips below can help resolve contractual altercations:
Disagreements regarding business deals occur in numerous different sectors; as the Project Management Institute (PMI) notes, the frequency of such conflicts, paired with their relatively high cost when navigated through the court system, has led to an increase in non-litigation approaches to resolving contract disputes across the board. While litigation is still a commonplace response to impasses over contractual obligations, clearly outlining each participant’s deliverables, timelines, and duties can improve collaboration and communication between those involved in a binding agreement and mitigate contractual contentions.
Understand more concerning the various techniques for averting contract disputes and learn how a New York business litigation attorney can assist businesses with disagreements by reaching out to Schwab & Gasparini’s Syracuse offices at (315) 422-1333 in Syracuse, the White Plains or Hudson Valley locations at (914) 304-4353, or the Albany site at (518) 591-4664.
Syracuse
109 South Warren Street
Suite 306
Syracuse, NY 13202
Phone: 315-422-1333
Fax: 315-671-5013
White Plains
222 Bloomingdale Road
Suite 200
White Plains, NY 10605
Phone: 914-304-4353
Fax: 914-304-4378
Hudson Valley
1441 Route 22
Suite 206
Brewster, NY 10509
Phone: 914-304-4353
Fax: 914-304-4378
Albany
17 Elk Street
Albany, NY 12207
Phone: 518-591-4664
Fax: 315-671-5013
© Copyright 2024 Schwab & Gasparini. All Rights Reserved. Sitemap | Legal | Law Firm Internet Marketing by Law Firm Essentials